鐵之狂傲

標題: 《水面作戰》美國海軍武庫艦(Arsenal Ship) 計劃 [列印本頁]

作者: 克里斯Chris    時間: 07-9-6 18:24
標題: 《水面作戰》美國海軍武庫艦(Arsenal Ship) 計劃
Arsenal Ship
美國武庫艦(火力艦)


(最終因經費不足而取消)



原文:
Arsenal ship was a joint Navy / DARPA program to acquire a moderate cost, high firepower demonstrator ship with low manning as soon as possible. The Arsenal Ship was planned to restore the naval support of the land battle, the modern day equivalent of the firepower that battleships provided during World War II and in Korea. The plan was to produce the demonstrator ship for initial operational capability (IOC) by the year 2000. Based on successful demonstration, a total force of four to six Arsenal ships would be funded. The goal was to develop an Arsenal Ship (AS) functional design by the end of FY97. This timeline from concept design (FY96) through fabrication (FY00) represented half the development time of previous naval vessels of this complexity. The Arsenal Ship would contains four times the VLS cells found on a CG-52 class ship, have a fixed unit sailaway price of $450 million, and a life-cycle cost 50% less than that of a naval combatant.

But in early 1997 the House National Security Committee concluded that the Arsenal Ship and the SC-21 were two separate major warship development programs, and that the cost of carrying out two such programs would be unaffordable, while the requirement for both had been validated by the Secretary of Defense. On 24 October 1997 the House-Senate conference committee on the FY1998 Defense Authorization Bill on refused additional funding for the Arsenal Ship. With only $35 million appropriated, the Navy needed an additional $115 million to sustain the program. That day the Secretary of the Navy announced that the program would not be pursued. Some of the design work has been incorporated into the SC-21 and DD-21 program. On 01 December 1997 the National Defense Panel report criticized the cancellation of the Arsenal Ship, noting that the ship could have reduced the need for aircraft carriers.


The Arsenal Ship was developed initially as a demonstration program to provide a large increase in the amount of ordnance available to ground- and sea-based forces in a conflict, particularly during the early days. The Navy envisioned that the ship would have a large capacity of different missiles, including Tomahawk and Standard, and space for future extended range gun systems. The ship could also have a sea-based version of the Army Tactical Missile System. This ship could greatly increase capabilities in littoral operations to conduct long-range strike missions, provide fire support for ground forces, defend against theater ballistic missiles, and maintain air superiority.
作者: 克里斯Chris    時間: 07-9-6 18:25
續:

The Arsenal Ship has the potential to provide substantial fire support to a variety of missions in regional conflicts without the logistics burden of transporting both delivery systems and ammunition to the shore and forward areas. The Arsenal Ship is expected to carry a large number of VLS cells but without the sophisticated command and control and radar equipment found on Aegis-equipped ships.

The ships would be theater assets that will operate under the authority of the joint Commanders-In-Chief (CINCs) and receive their targeting along with command and decision information from other assets. This ship will rely on other military assets, including surface combatants, to provide the targeting information and connectivity necessary to launch its weapons. The Arsenal Ship would server as the magazine for a distributed sensor network. A unique aspect to the Arsenal Ship is that all the command and decision functions would be made off board.

Thus, the Arsenal Ship will not be fitted with long range surveillance or fire control sensors, but will be remotely controlled via robust data links. The data links will be secure, redundant and anti-jam in order to provide high reliability in the connectivity of the Arsenal Ships in high jamming operational scenarios. The overall program is an attempt to leverage the significant joint investment in Link 16 and CEC. Early in arsenal ship's life this control will be exercised through an Aegis platform. As the theater connectivity matures, the Arsenal Ship would accommodate a more robust set of controls from a wide variety of sources that would include JSTARS aircraft, AWACS or an E-2 with Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC) and, a soldier or a Marine on the ground or a command post ashore. This concept allows for remote missile selection, on-board missile initialization and remote launch orders, and provides remote "missile away" messages to the control platform.
作者: 克里斯Chris    時間: 07-9-6 18:25
續:

The ship would have the equivalent ordnance bout 500 vertically launched weapons from a wide variety of the military  inventoryf about four or five Aegis cruisers and destroyers. Employing the Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC) emote magazine?launch concept, the arsenal ship would provide additional magazine capacity for Theater Ballistic Missile Defense (TBMD) and Air Supremacy missiles.


The Navy envisioned the ship to have a small crew (possibly less than 50 members) and be highly survivable. Associated with minimizing ship costs and manning is the planned reliance on passive survivability, so that it would be very difficult for the Arsenal Ship to be hit by modern weapons. This may be achieved by a combination of reducing the signatures of the ship and the tactical use of countermeasures. If the ship is hit by a missile or a torpedo, the design would insure that the magazines are not violated. Finally, the hull would be sized and designed such that, even if the ship encounters a large torpedo or mine, the ship won't sink.
作者: 克里斯Chris    時間: 07-9-6 18:26
續:


Arsenal Ship想像圖


The Navy planned to maintain the Arsenal Ship forward deployed in major overseas regions for extended periods by rotating the ship  crew and returning the ship only for major maintenance and overhauls. This plan would allow the Navy to use fewer Arsenal Ships to maintain overseas presence than if the ships were deployed routinely from the United States and permit their early availability in a conflict. Additionally, if the Arsenal Ship concept proves successful and within its cost projections (around $500 million for construction of each ship), DOD and the Navy may be able to retire or forego purchases of some assets, such as aircraft carriers, surface combatants, ground-based launchers, or combat aircraft.


The Arsenal Ship Program's acquisition approach represented a major departure from the way Navy ships have been acquired in the past. The program turned the systems development process over to industry at its earliest stage and challenges industry to develop and design the optimum mix of performance capabilities which can be accommodated within production and life-cycle affordability constraints. In an effort to optimize streamlined technical and business approaches, the program used DARPA's Section 845 authority to conduct prototype development and acquisition experiments outside normal constraints of the Federal Acquisition Regulations.
作者: 克里斯Chris    時間: 07-9-6 18:26
續:

Experience during the Arsenal Ship Project showed that to achieve a design balanced between cost and performance, a significant amount of interchange was required among subject experts, analysts, and the technical personnel developing the system and functional designs. Additionally, subject experts from outside of the team were used to assure critical performance requirements were understood and satisfied. However, because of the limitations on access applied during the Arsenal Ship Project, achieving the design balance became quite difficult.

In July 1996, DARPA awarded each of five industry teams $1 million Phase I agreements under full and open competition. Since that time, the five teams performed various trade-off studies and developed their initial Arsenal Ship design concepts based upon the government Ship Capabilities Document and the Concept of Operations. The Phase I Arsenal Ship Concept Designs, in conjunction with the three successful offeror's Phase II proposals, formed the basis for the Phase II selection and were deemed as providing the best value to the government.

In early 1996 the program was redesignated the Maritime Fire Support Demonstrator (MFSD). The new effort broadened the scope to insert technologies into the demonstrator in preparation for risk reduction for SC-21. The MFSD was to be an at-sea technology testbed for the SC-21, the next-generation CVX aircraft carrier, and other future ships.
作者: 克里斯Chris    時間: 07-9-6 18:27
續:

In Phase II, which lasted one year, three industry teams continued to develop their concept designs into functional designs consisting of an integrated engineering and cost baseline for the Arsenal Ship Program. On 10 January 1997 DARPA selected three industry teams for Phase II of the Arsenal Ship Program. The three selected industry teams were each awarded $15 million modifications to their existing Phase I Arsenal Ship agreements. The three Phase II industry teams were:

General Dynamics, Marine/Bath Iron Works, Bath, Maine, Team Leader, with: General Dynamics, Marine/Electric Boat, Groton, Conn.; Raytheon Electronic Systems, Lexington, Mass.; and Science Applications International Corp., McLean, Va.

Lockheed Martin, Government Electronic Systems, Morrestown, N.J., Team Leader, with: Litton Industries/Ingalls Shipbuilding, Pascagoula, Miss.; and Newport News Shipbuilding, Newport News, Va.

Northrop Grumman Corporation, Sykesville, Md., Team Leader, with: National Steel and Shipbuilding Co., San Diego, Calif.; Vitro Corp., Rockville, Md.; Solipsys, Columbia, Md.; and Band Lavis & Associates, Inc., Severna Park, Md.

After Phase II, DARPA planned to select one industry team to enter into Phase III, with the Navy to award an MFSD design and construction contract to one of the three Arsenal Ship teams in January 1998. During that phase, the industry team chosen would complete its detail design and construct an Arsenal Ship Demonstrator, as well as provide an irrevocable offer to construct five additional Arsenal Ships and convert the Arsenal Ship Demonstrator into a fully operational asset in the production phase (Phase V). Phase IV consists of performance testing and a fleet evaluation. The value of the research and development portion (Phases I-IV) of the program was approximately $520 million.


Specific objectives to be demonstrated included the ability to perform the operational mission for 90 days; architecture, communications, and datalink functions capable of satisfying the AS concept of operations; and the capability for remote launch of strike, area air warfare, and fire support weapons. The planned test program will include a salvo launch of up to three Tomahawk missiles in 3 minutes; a single SM2 launch using the AS as a remote magazine for a cooperative engagement capability ship, a single Tomahawk launch using the AS as a remote magazine for air-directed and shore-based targeting, and a single weapon launch from a VLS cell in support of a naval surface fire control mission digital call for fire.
作者: 克里斯Chris    時間: 07-9-6 18:28
Programmed DTO Funding ($ millions) (實驗艦所用經費)PEProjectFY97FY98FY99FY00FY01FY02FY030603763EMRN-0115.047.050.036.022.000Total S&T15.047.050.036.022.0000603852N*S229425.0141.090.580.211.400Total40.0188.0140.5116.233.400
作者: 克里斯Chris    時間: 07-9-6 18:28
Arsenal Ship
美國武庫艦(火力艦)





作者: 克里斯Chris    時間: 07-9-6 18:28
Specifications(數據)
Armament 500-cell Vertical Launch System (VLS)
Tomahawk Land-Attack Missiles (TLAMs)
Army Tactical Missile System
Crew~~ 50; designed to be highly automated
DesignLow radar signature ("stealthy")
double hull
possible length 500-800 feet
Estimated NumberSix vessels
Cost$500-800 Million each
missiles will cost ~~$500 million

作者: 克里斯Chris    時間: 07-9-6 18:30
武器介紹:

武庫艦
(Arsenal Ship)




武庫艦是美國海軍的制定21世紀戰艦(SC-21)計劃時提 出的一種大型水面艦方案。未來的武庫般能以強大的火力對地面作戰實施火力支援、對空防禦和作為導彈武器的發射平台。美國海軍目前正在對這種艦的初步設想進 行評估,包括設計參數、可能配備的武器和費用等。根據初步設想,武庫艦至少244米,排水量在11900噸以上,有 500個導彈垂直發射管,可配備多種導彈,包括「戰斧」 巡航導彈、「標準」艦對空導彈、「魚叉」反艦導彈, 以及設計用於戰區導彈防禦和對岸火力支援的新型導彈。艦上的其他武器裝備包括:兩門155毫米艦和2400發先進 的制導炮彈、反導系統、兩架艦載直升機、一架無人機、兩個遙控滅雷器、兩個無人潛航器、一定數量的魚雷 ,以及聲納、通信系統和作戰指揮系統等。

艦體為雙殼體結構,上層建築很小。作戰時,艦體露出水面的高度僅 1.5米,以盡量減小對雷達波的反射。武庫艦將編入航母戰鬥群,並由它提供空中掩護和作戰信息。該艦隻需20名 艦員,但需要補給艦隨行,以便及時為垂直發射系統重新裝彈。如果這種武庫艦研製成功並裝備部隊,將分擔航 空母艦的部分作戰功能。
作者: 克里斯Chris    時間: 07-9-6 18:32
美國原文資料翻譯:

未來的主力艦(火力艦)


主力艦經由一次大戰的炮艦,二戰時期的大艦巨砲,(副砲戰力小故揚棄副砲,改就大口徑主砲)
由德國的H戰列艦計畫的最後設計圖H-44.美軍的艾荷華級以及未成軍的蒙大拿級.以及日軍的大和號為代表.

但由於空母的優勢,戰列艦式微.然而飛彈巡洋艦的理念整合到戰列艦上,即是未來的主力艦,有稱火力艦,武庫艦.

主以飛彈為接戰戰力,遠程打擊為主軸.通常的標準是一艦攜帶500具以上VLS系統.對高價值目標無情的轟擊,再由飛機攜帶傳統炸彈摧毀低價值目標.

作者: 克里斯Chris    時間: 07-9-6 18:34
武器專題:

導彈戰列艦


其實美國早在90年代已經提出類似構想,那就是火力艦。
火力艦資料,引自MDC:



美國曾在1990年代初期提出「火力艦」(Arsenal Ship)的概念。

這種革命性的軍艦長270m,寬32m,航速約25節。火力艦擁有極為低矮的上層結構與半潛式艦體,船舷由下往上向內收縮,艦底設有可調節的壓載水艙,使水面以上的乾舷低保持在1.5m左右,此種構型不僅雷達截面積極低,其乾舷高度也小於絕大部分反艦飛彈的最小射高,使來襲飛彈很容易從艦體上方掠過或擦過。

火力艦本身也是十分堅固耐打,整體存活設計吸收了大型商船與郵輪的經驗,擁有雙層艦殼、大量的水密隔艙與極為厚實的裝甲,艦體防禦能力遠超過二次大戰以後的水面艦,魚叉、飛魚等級的反艦飛彈對火力艦的裝甲恐怕只有搔癢的份。

此外,火力艦上配備全自動的損管消防設施,這對於人員編制稀少的火力艦而言格外重要。武裝方面,火力艦擁有500管以上的垂直發射系統(VLS),可攜帶各式攻擊性飛彈對敵方陸上目標展開暴雨般的打擊,包括戰斧巡航飛彈、陸軍戰術飛彈系統以及自衛用的標準防空飛彈等等。為了節省造價、人力與增加匿蹤性,火力艦本身並未設置偵測裝備,單靠網路傳輸方式由友軍單位傳送目標資料;換而言之,火力艦本身完全沒有防空作戰能力,完全依靠前述降低被偵測、被擊中機率、損管裝備以及厚甲重鎧來存活。

作者: 克里斯Chris    時間: 07-9-6 18:35
續:

由於機能簡單且自動化程度高,火力艦只需不到20名人員就可操作。根據美國海軍的估計,火力艦在開戰的前四天內便能攻擊4000個目標,遠高於16架B-2轟炸機(420個目標)以及由航空母艦起飛的作戰機隊(1800個目標),能為陸戰隊提供充足的火力支援,在最短時間內遏止並癱瘓敵軍。運作成本方面,當時每艘火力艦造價約5億美元,每年運作費用約數千萬美元,且僅需編制不到20人;而一艘航艦造價則為45億美元,每年運作費用高達4.4億美元,艦上乘員達5000之眾,而且以上數據還不包括與航艦一起行動的各型水面艦與潛艦。
作者: 克里斯Chris    時間: 07-9-6 18:36
續:

火力艦一度是美國海軍21世紀水面戰艦(SC-21)計畫的要角,但是這種艦艇速度太慢跟不上航空母艦戰鬥群,也缺乏獨立偵測、運作與自衛的能力,需要其他友艦支援保護。雖然火力艦看似武力強大,但是在實際執行武力投射任務時,使用彈性卻比不上航艦艦載機隊(例如飛彈發射後就很難變更目標或取消攻擊)。而除了對陸上目標進行打擊外,火力艦毫無其他用處;而作戰時如果無法順利獲得友軍傳輸資料,將大幅妨礙火力艦的運作,這在後冷戰時代任務多元化且強調反應速度的趨勢下簡直是大逆不道。於是這種一度被某些人認為未來可以取代航空母艦的明日之星,便在1997年10月遭到取消。



(海軍因經費問題於1997年10月取消了「武庫艦」計劃。)
作者: 克里斯Chris    時間: 07-9-6 18:38
武器舊聞:

「海上武庫」導彈艦


凡關注世界軍事變革局勢的人大概都還記得:1997年10月,轟動一時的美國海軍「武庫艦」,終因得不到所需經費而被迫下馬。而當時被各種媒體炒得沸沸揚揚的「武庫艦」,正是名副其實的導彈艦。據悉,按照當時的設計,「武庫艦 」將裝載多達500枚的各型導彈。

  時過境遷,到了2001年11月1日,美國防部舊話重提,宣佈將 D D-21對地攻擊型驅逐艦發展計劃重新命名為 D D( X),著重強調了未來聯合作戰所需的多種能力。其實, D D( X)計劃基本上是和 D D-21計劃一脈相承的,核心內容均通過移花接木的方法保留了下來:即 D D( X)驅逐艦仍將是一種全新的裝載多達250枚各型導彈的導彈艦。

作者: 克里斯Chris    時間: 07-9-6 18:38
續:

時至今日,從「武庫艦」項目的下馬,到 D D( X)驅逐艦的繼續研發,可以看出導彈艦已起死回生,並重新找到了與海軍新戰略相溝通的途徑。為了確保 21世紀進入近海作戰區域,不得不考慮未來艦隊將要面對的空中和導彈威脅。


正如美國海軍所稱:「通過新的策略,美海軍已經制定了導彈艦發展的藍圖,能夠確保完成未來全維打擊的各種作戰任務。」那麼,21世紀全新理念的導彈艦究竟 「熱」在哪裡呢?
作者: 克里斯Chris    時間: 07-9-6 18:39
「導彈熱」的登峰之作

  導彈在二戰後的大大小小局部戰爭中確實發揮出色,這一點是有目共睹的。特別是在1982年的英阿馬島海戰中,再次証明瞭導彈的威力。而水面艦似乎又那麼不經打,一枚「飛魚」導彈就擊沉了一艘英國42型驅逐艦,從而給人們一種印象:水面艦艇似乎一夜間變成了導彈的靶子。難怪在1991年的海灣戰爭中,美軍使用了大量的高技術武器,像「戰斧」導彈這樣的精確制導武器出盡了風頭,再次顯示了導彈的威力,把導彈化推向了極點。
作者: 克里斯Chris    時間: 07-9-6 18:39
導彈化與訊息化並進

  未來,水面戰艦的所有武器裝備和設備,都將通過計算機網絡系統聯成一體,將由一個「多媒體訊息指揮與控制中心」控制。未來水面戰艦裝備的各型導彈,都將大量使用垂直發射系統發射。導彈垂直發射系統具有許多突出的優點,比如載彈量大,可以全向攻擊,多枚導彈同時齊射,而且可以佈置在艙面以下,隱蔽性、機動性、靈活性明顯優於傳統的導彈發射系統。
作者: 克里斯Chris    時間: 07-9-6 18:40
海上演兵效果非凡

  1997年3月,美國海軍在加利福尼亞海岸外進行的「阿爾法作戰演習」表明,當時研發的新概念「武庫艦」(導彈艦)在21世紀的作戰中提供了猛烈的火力支援,從而大大縮短了挫敗敵軍攻擊所需的時間。在此次演兵中,美國第三艦隊演示了預期於2005年爆發的海戰的一些特點,美海軍用「阿利‧伯克」級「本福德 」號驅逐艦模擬武庫艦的能力,當「本福德」號作為雙航母戰鬥群的一員參戰時,大約需要6天時間摧毀戰役計劃確定的600個目標,而當它作為裝載500枚導彈的 「武庫艦」參戰時,摧毀這些目標只需一天半的時間。「實戰」表明,「武庫艦 」大有引領21世紀新型戰艦風騷的趨勢。

  以上幾個方面顯示,導彈艦的新穎之處就在於先進的導彈化和信息化。導彈艦的第一個革命性技術標誌,是超量導彈化。艦艇導彈化在當今時代是一個很普遍的趨勢,導彈現在既可以裝在潛艇上,也可以裝在所有的水面戰鬥艦艇上,但導彈艦是要配裝500個發射裝置,配載1000枚以上的導彈,這種量變必將引發21世紀海戰方式的質變。導彈艦的第二個革命性技術標誌是高度信息化,這是其最新穎也是最奇特的概念。導彈艦最引人注目的,首先是一個武器的大庫房,再就是發射平台,而且除了本艦的各型雷達和傳感器,還增加了「協同作戰能力系統」 ( C E C),以實現全維海戰場的信息共享。因此,可以認為21世紀的導彈艦是當今導彈化、訊息化技術融合與發展到高水平的一種必然產物,是水到渠成般的現代海戰頂尖裝備,而不是「高大奇新」的花架子。
作者: 克里斯Chris    時間: 07-9-6 18:41
全維作戰最佳效能

  然而,首先踐行21世紀導彈艦新理念的並不是號稱世界海軍老大的美國海軍戰艦,而是俄羅斯海軍的「基洛夫」級核動力導彈巡洋艦。除航母之外,「基洛夫」級導彈巡洋艦是二次大戰以來建造的最大的水面戰艦。其排水量達2.4萬噸,加上其重型武器及龐大的艦體,被西方稱之為「戰列巡洋艦」。「基洛夫」級可以用作特混艦隊的旗艦,在高威脅環境中利用其強大的反艦和防空能力可為特遣艦隊提供一個保護傘,它裝載有400多枚各型導彈,可在各種環境中進行全維作戰,均能發揮最佳效能。

  「基洛夫」級的主要武器是20枚「花崗岩」超音速遠程巡航導彈(北約稱 S S- N-19),它們以60°的傾斜角安裝在主甲板的下面。該導彈裝有750千克重的高爆常規戰鬥部或35萬噸當量的核戰鬥部。導彈的射程為500千米以上,在飛行中可以變換目標瞄準參數。如果首枚導彈被攔截,則其他導彈中的一枚會自動擔負起首枚導彈的任務。「花崗岩」導彈的飛行軌跡很低,可以有效地避開敵方實施的干擾。「基洛夫」級還裝備有多層次的先進防空武器系統。

  「基洛夫」級除「彼得大帝」號外,其他3艘艦進行現代化改裝。其中太平洋艦隊的「拉扎列夫海軍上將」號早在1997年就已開始在海參崴船廠進行改裝,隨後北方艦隊的「烏沙科夫海軍上將」號也進入北德文斯克船廠改裝。改裝後將換裝射程超過500千米的新型反艦導彈,或射程超過3000千米的巡航導彈,換裝射程超過200千米的改進型 S A- N-9型防空導彈。完成改裝的3艘「基洛夫 」級和正在服役的1艘「彼得大帝」號巡洋艦,將服役至2020年左右,並將成為這一時期保持俄海軍作戰能力的中堅力量。

作者: 克里斯Chris    時間: 07-9-6 18:43
調整對策 迎頭趕超

  美國海軍不甘心落在俄海軍之後,在「武庫艦」項目暫時下馬後,重新安排了兩個導彈艦研發計劃,一是縮小了的「武庫艦」——— D D( X)驅逐艦;二是水下武庫艦——— S S G N型「俄亥俄」級核動力巡航導彈潛艇。

  D D( X)級驅逐艦的首要任務是在沿海地區實施對陸精確攻擊作戰,該級艦將逐步取代美海軍20世紀70年代後服役、2008年後陸續退役的斯普魯恩斯級驅逐艦和佩裡級導彈護衛艦。因此, D D( X)級驅逐艦必須於2009年開始服役,計劃共建32艘。設想中的 D D( X)級驅逐艦的排水量在1.2萬噸左右,服役期將長達40年以上。儘管 D D( X)級艦比伯克級要大1/3,但是造價和運行費用卻要經濟得多,採購32艘艦的總經費不到250億美元。

  D D( X)級驅逐艦將主要用於對陸攻擊,因此裝備了一批火力猛、精度高的對陸攻擊先進武器。該級艦可配備4套 M K41型導彈垂直發射系統,每套有64個發射單元,共256個發射單元,至少可以混裝256枚各型導彈,實際上是一艘縮小了的「武庫艦」。 D D( X)驅逐艦將裝備2種對陸攻擊導彈,一種是遠程導彈,另一種是中程導彈。其中,遠程導彈將選用改進型「戰斧 I V」巡航導彈,其重大改進是增大射程至3000千米、加大飛行速度至1.5馬赫,且提高了射擊精度、降低了建造費用、逐步實現了隱身化。

  
據外刊報導,2002年6月,美國海軍在弗吉尼亞州亞歷山德裡亞召開的第20屆海軍潛艇協會年會上,宣佈了將「俄亥俄」級核動力彈道導彈潛艇( S S B N)改裝成巡航導彈核動力潛艇( S S G N)的詳細計劃。「俄亥俄」號於2002年10 月至2006年、「密執安」號於2004年至2007年,將在華盛頓州佈雷默頓的普吉特海峽海軍造船廠改型,「佛羅里達」號於2003年至2007年、「佐治亞」號於2004 年至2007年將在弗吉尼亞州樸茨茅斯的諾福克海軍造船廠改裝,4艘巡航導彈核潛艇( S S G N)均將於2007年形成初始作戰能力,計劃延長服役期20年。屆時,每艘「俄亥俄」級核潛艇將能攜帶多達154枚的「戰斧 B l o c kⅢ」型遠程攻擊巡航導彈,或在執行特種作戰任務時攜載96-126枚「戰術戰斧」型對陸攻擊巡航導彈。至此,「俄亥俄」級彈道導彈核潛艇將摘下核威懾的面具,搖身一變而成為可攜載154枚導彈的超大型海上武庫導彈艦。

(完)




歡迎光臨 鐵之狂傲 (https://gamez.com.tw/)